Categories
News

Lethbridge city council appoints cop’s dad to police commission

Newly-elected city councillor John Middleton-Hope was recently appointed to the Lethbridge Police Commission. His son is a constable with LPS.

At the start of November, the newly-elected Lethbridge City Council met for their organizational meeting. In it, they outlined the deputy mayor and acting mayor schedule for the next four years.

They also assigned themselves to various boards, commissions, and committees.

One of the commissions included in these appointments was the Lethbridge Police Commission, which will receive Belinda Crowson, who is now in her second term on council, and John Middleton-Hope, who is a rookie councillor.

Crowson had previously sat as a council representative on the commission during the last administration, so her continued presence could be useful on the commission.

Middleton-Hope is new to the commission as a councillor, but he comes with nearly 3 decades of experience in policing, including a 4-year stint as police chief in Lethbridge.

While it can be useful having a background in policing to understand the issues brought forward to the commission, it can also call question to his ability to be impartial. If an issue comes forward that criticizes the service in some capacity, would his closeness to policing in general and this specific service affect his ability to be open-minded?

It’s not just impartiality though.

In 2012, Middleton-Hope’s son Chris became a constable with the Lethbridge Police Service. That seems like closer to a conflict of interest than simply having been a cop for nearly 30 years.

It’s not the first time a city councillor has been on the commission while a family member has been a cop.

Our newest mayor, Blaine Hyggen, for example, served on the commission as a city councillor for 2020 and 2021. His brother, Braylon, has been a constable with the service since 2016, as a K-9 officer, as well as part of the downtown policing unit.

I may not have been the only one to notice this potential conflict of interest.

In the minutes from the organizational meeting, there was a reference to closed meeting discussions about the appointments:

Be it resolved that Council direct that the closed meeting discussions, reports, documents and attachments with respect to City Council Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees remain confidential pursuant to Sections 24 (Advice from Officials) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Because that discussion was part of an in-camera meeting, we won’t have access to what was discussed. It’d be interesting to find out what concerns were raised in that meeting, however.

I also note that Crowson, the other councillor on the police commission was the only member of city council to oppose the board, committee, and council appointments, which were approved as an entire slate by a vote of 8–1.

No one on council questioned Crowson on her vote, and there was no chance to debate the motion, so there is no public record of her rationale for the opposition.

Crowson did not oppose any appointments of members of the public to boards, committees, and commissions.

Support independent journalism

By Kim Siever

Kim Siever is an independent journalist based in Lethbridge, Alberta. He writes daily news stories, focusing on municipal, provincial, and federal politics, specializing in investigative journalism and critical analysis from a leftist political lens. He also writes regular editorials on general politics and social issues.

4 replies on “Lethbridge city council appoints cop’s dad to police commission”

This is surprising to me.The City and/or the Police Commission must have a conflict of interest policy that defines whether a member may have a direct family member in the service. It’d be interesting to see what this policy says. For a non-profit, it would not be kosher to have a direct family member of an employee on the board.

Thanks for posting the link. Interesting. I think the relevant piece is 2.1 Selection and Appointment of Commission Members section (4) which says that only being personally employed by another police service is a barrier to joining the commission. So his appointment is OK under the existing policy. I wonder whether anybody has appetite to tighten this policy. It might help to enhance the credibility of the police commission.

Comment on this story

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.